A comparison of common 3D Printing interface patterns
Selection Factors:
- Model geometry type
- Surface quality requirements
- Available print time
- Material cost constraints
- Post-processing needs
| Attribute | Grid | Rectilinear Interlaced | Concentric | Rectilinear |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Material Usage | 50g - Moderate | 45g - Moderate | 60g - Can vary significantly | 40g - Potentially lower than grid |
| Print Time | 120min - Moderate | 110min - Slightly higher than grid | 140min - Can vary greatly | 100min - Generally faster than grid |
| Support Removal | 3/5 - Generally easy | 4/5 - Can be slightly more challenging | 2/5 - Can be difficult | 5/5 - Moderate |
| Surface Quality | 4/5 - Can leave visible marks | 5/5 - Can minimize marks | 3/5 - Can cause more significant marks | 5/5 - Can have varying impact |
| Strength & Stability | Generally good | Potentially improved | Can provide strong support | Varies significantly |
| Key Characteristics | Balanced support Better vertical resistance Moderate usage | 90° alternating layers Prevents direct stacking Moderate material use | Circular pattern Highest usage Longest time | Simple linear pattern Lowest usage Fastest print |
| Benefits | Good structure Reliable for complex models | Enhanced bonding Excellent finish Easy removal | Best for cylinders Uniform support | Easiest removal Best finish Perfect for 100% infill |
| Limitations | Medium removal difficulty Good but not best finish | Complex pattern Higher usage than basic | Hardest removal Poor finish Highest material use | Not for complex shapes Limited vertical strength |
| Post-Processing Effort | Moderate | Can require slightly more effort | Often requires significant effort | Can vary widely |
Selection Factors:
- Model geometry type
- Surface quality requirements
- Available print time
- Material cost constraints
- Post-processing needs